Case 2304832/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Inayat v Travelodge Hotels Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304832/2022
- Decision date
- 28 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leith Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Inayat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 28 June 2023 before Employment Judge Leith, the tribunal recorded that the complaints of disability discrimination, sex discrimination, gender reassignment discrimination, redundancy payment and unauthorised deduction from wages were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant, Mr S Inayat. The hearing was held in private by video (CVP), and the respondent was represented by Miss Davies, solicitor.
The judgment states that the dismissal of those complaints followed the claimant's withdrawal of them. No findings on the underlying merits of those claims, and no monetary award, are recorded in this judgment. The tribunal also noted that the claimant's remaining claims would proceed to hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Sex discrimination | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Gender reassignment discrimination | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | Gender reassignment | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.