Case 2304833/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Johnston v Jeremy Jackson and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304833/2022
- Decision date
- 20 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss E Johnston
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Rice-Birchall found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss E Johnston's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £1,016.57. The judgment also recorded that the respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars and awarded two weeks' pay, calculated at £499.16 net.
The tribunal further found that the respondent failed to give pay statements in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in August, September and October 2022. No separate monetary award was stated for that finding in the judgment. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment was £1,515.73 net.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,017 |
| Other | The judgment records a failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars and awards two weeks' pay, calculated at £499.16 net. | Upheld | — | £499 |
| Other | The judgment records a failure to give pay statements in August, September and October 2022, but no separate monetary award is stated for this finding. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,516
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.