Case 2304837/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Gittens v JD Fitness Group — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304837/2022
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Cawthray Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Gittens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss T Gittens brought claims arising from non-payment of wages and holiday pay against JD Fitness Group Limited. The respondent did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge G Cawthray found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant the full amount due between 9 October 2022 and 13 October 2022, and ordered payment of £323.08 gross, calculated at a daily rate of £80.77 for 4 days.
The tribunal also found an unauthorised deduction from wages in relation to accrued but untaken annual leave on termination. It found that the claimant accrued 18 days' holiday between 22 February 2022 and 13 October 2022, took 7 days, and was therefore owed 11 days' holiday pay on leaving. The respondent was ordered to pay £888.47 gross, calculated at £80.77 per day. The judgment records that tax and national insurance deductions may be made from both sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 9 October 2022 to 13 October 2022; award was the gross sum of £323.08, calculated at £80.77 per day for 4 days. The judgment says tax and national insurance deductions may be made. | Upheld | — | £323 |
| Holiday pay | Unauthorised deduction from wages for failure to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken annual leave on termination. The tribunal found that 18 days accrued between 22 February and 13 October 2022, 7 days were taken, and 11 days were outstanding; award was the gross sum of £888.47, calculated at £80.77 per day. The judgment says tax and national insurance deductions may be made. | Upheld | — | £888 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,212
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.