Case 2304839/2022 · Employment Tribunal
F Shahabzada v Finishing Touches Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304839/2022
- Decision date
- 29 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
F Shahabzada
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 18 December 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,949.50 gross. No separate split of the award was given in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £3,949.50 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,950 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,950
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.