Case 2304856/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Galpin Miss J Murray v Pizza Kent Ltd (t/a Firezza Pizza) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304856/2020
- Decision date
- 22 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Galpin Miss J Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response. Employment Judge Andrews therefore entered judgment under Rule 21 and recorded that the claims for unlawful deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay succeed. The judgment does not set out the underlying merits findings in detail because it is a default judgment based on the absence of a response.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this decision. It directed that the remedy for each claimant would be dealt with at a hearing on 8 October 2021, and that the respondent would be permitted to participate only at the discretion of the Judge. The claimants were directed to file remedy statements and supporting calculations by 3 September 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | No response was entered by the respondent, so the unlawful deductions from wages claim succeeded under Rule 21. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was listed for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | No response was entered by the respondent, so the unpaid holiday pay claim succeeded under Rule 21. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was listed for a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.