Case 2304863/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Booth v 1) LG Electronics UK Ltd 2) Bumseop Lee — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304863/2023
- Decision date
- 18 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Booth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a hearing at London South, in private by CVP, on 18 March 2025 before Employment Judge Heath, with Mr K Ali appearing for the claimant and Ms S Berry for the respondents. The written record states that the respondents' applications for strike out and/or deposit orders dated 2 September 2024 were refused.
The extract does not set out any merits determination on the underlying employment claims, nor does it record any remedy award. It also notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note attached to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The supplied judgment text records only that the respondents' applications for strike out and/or deposit orders dated 2 September 2024 were refused. It does not record a substantive merits determination for any underlying claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.