Case 2304875/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L. Morton-Holmes v Frys BBQ Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304875/2021
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R Smith
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L. Morton-Holmes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South via CVP on 23 March 2022 before Employment Judge T.R Smith. The claimant, Mr L. Morton-Holmes, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and had regard to the tribunal file before giving judgment orally.
The tribunal found the claimant’s complaint of unlawful deduction from wages well founded and ordered Frys BBQ Limited to pay £4,916.60 forthwith. It also found the claimant’s complaint of breach of contract well founded and ordered payment of £576.92 forthwith. No separate reasons were provided in writing because reasons had been given orally at the hearing and no request for written reasons was recorded in the written decision.
The judgment records no discrimination, dismissal, or whistleblowing claims. The total monetary award on the face of the decision is £5,493.52, made up of the two amounts ordered on the two upheld claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,917 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £577 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,494
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.