Case 2304896/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. L. Batchelar v Govia Thameslink Railway Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304896/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Representation
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. L. Batchelar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr L Batchelar brought a claim against Govia Thameslink Railway Limited, heard at London South Croydon on 25 and 26 November 2020 before Employment Judge Sage.
The tribunal did not make findings on the merits. It recorded that the Claimant's claim was dismissed on withdrawal on terms agreed between the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal on terms agreed between the parties. The unfair dismissal classification is taken from the supplied listing category, as the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded causes of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed on withdrawal on terms agreed between the parties. The public interest disclosure classification is taken from the supplied listing category, as the judgment text itself does not set out the pleaded causes of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.