Case 2304914/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Gianluca Mazzoni Case Number 2304914/2023 v Bocca Social Limited Open preliminary hearing — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304914/2023
- Decision date
- 31 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gianluca Mazzoni Case Number 2304914/2023
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter came before Employment Judge M Aspinall sitting alone at the London South Employment Tribunal on 31 May 2024 as an open preliminary hearing. The Respondent had been precluded from participating under Rule 21 for failing to enter a response and did not attend. The Tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim on the basis that the Claimant did not meet the requisite two years' continuous service, and dismissed the age discrimination claim because the Claimant had not adequately particularised the alleged discriminatory statements and actions.
The Tribunal upheld the remaining claims. It declared that the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages properly due to the Claimant for June 2023 in the sum of £3,300, and ordered payment of £2,310 in respect of accrued but unpaid annual leave reasonably due on termination. It also ordered £825 for one week's statutory notice pay, having found the Respondent failed to provide minimum statutory notice on termination.
The Tribunal further found that the Respondent had failed to provide the Claimant with the written statement of employment terms and conditions required by law and awarded one week's pay of £825 as appropriate remedy. Judgment was entered against the Respondent in the gross total sum of £7,260, payable immediately, with the Claimant required to account to HMRC for any tax, National Insurance or other deductions properly due.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the Claimant did not meet the 2 years' continuous service qualifying period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed as the Claimant failed to adequately particularise the alleged discriminatory statements and actions. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deductions from wages properly due for June 2023. | Upheld | — | £3,300 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued paid annual leave reasonably due upon termination but not provided. | Upheld | — | £2,310 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to provide minimum statutory notice upon termination; award of one week's statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £825 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment terms and conditions; one week's pay awarded as remedy. | Upheld | — | £825 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,260
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.