Case 2304922/2021 · Employment Tribunal
No appearance or v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304922/2021
- Decision date
- 29 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
1 namedClaimant
No appearance or
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Truscott QC on 20 July 2022. The claimant, Mrs J John, did not appear or be represented. The respondent was represented by Ms W Miller of Counsel. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had made no contact with ACAS, had ticked “no” to the ET1 question about an early conciliation certificate number, and had presented the claim on 23 September 2021 about events said to have occurred in November 2020.
The tribunal held that the disability discrimination claim was not presented in accordance with the Early Conciliation Regulations and that, accordingly, it had no jurisdiction. It also held that the claim was presented outside the primary limitation period in section 123(1)(a) of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal found no evidence that the allegations formed part of a continuing act under section 123(3)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, and no basis on which it would be just and equitable to extend time under section 123(1)(b). In the absence of evidence explaining the delay or supporting an extension, the claim was dismissed. The hearing listed for 16 to 18 November 2022 was discharged.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed because no ACAS Early Conciliation Certificate was sought or provided, and because the disability discrimination claim was presented outside the primary time limit. The tribunal found no evidence of a continuing act or any basis to extend time as just and equitable. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Early Conciliation: Exemptions and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2014
- section 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- section 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- section 123(3)(a) Equality Act 2010
- Harvey factors
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.