Case 2304926/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Global Hospitality Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304926/2022
- Decision date
- 27 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Faith Flanagan, Mr Jose Martins and Mr Jamie Goncalves all worked together as bar staff at the respondent's premises in Tooting and left in November 2022. They each said they had not been paid the wages or holiday pay they were entitled to after resigning. The judgment records awards in respect of unlawful deduction from wages and, for Miss Flanagan and Mr Martins, holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded to Miss Faith Flanagan in respect of unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £390 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded to Miss Faith Flanagan in respect of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £582 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded to Mr Jose Martins in respect of unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £1,788 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded to Mr Jose Martins in respect of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £409 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded to Mr Jamie Goncalves in respect of unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £580 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,749
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- Walters t/a Rosewood v Barik UKEAT/0053/16/BA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.