Case 2304945/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr D Morrison director — 2023
- Case reference
- 2304945/2021
- Decision date
- 17 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott KC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had applied for a commission-based business development role with Member Benefits Limited and worked under an agreement signed on 24 May 2021. The tribunal amended the respondent name to Member Benefits Limited. It found that the arrangement fell within the statutory definition of a worker in section 230 ERA 1996, but that the claimant was not an employee.
That finding disposed of the unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal held that, because the claimant was not an employee and did not have the requisite length of service, the unfair dismissal claim failed. The claim for travel expenses also failed because the tribunal held that section 27(2)(b) ERA 1996 excluded expense reimbursement from wages, so that claim could not be entertained as an unlawful deduction from wages.
On the commission claim, the tribunal accepted that some sums remained unpaid. It found £292.25 due on Invoice 1002, £235 due on Invoice 1003, £118.50 due on the Kingston invoice, and £568.75 as 25% of the undisputed items on Invoice 1004. It declined the additional 5% claimed on Invoice 1004 because it was unlikely those clients were included in the magazine, and it did not deduct the £500 paid on 2 June 2021 because the respondent had not shown a basis for doing so.
The resulting award was £1,214.50 for unpaid commission. The tribunal also referred to the absence of any financial reconciliation being provided to the claimant, and noted that the respondent's proposed treatment of some transactions was disputed, including whether certain client orders had been cancelled or not paid.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was a worker under section 230(3)(b) ERA 1996 but was not an employee, and in any event did not have the requisite length of service to bring an unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that £1,214.50 was due for unpaid commission. It accepted Invoice 1002 (£292.25), Invoice 1003 (£235), the Kingston invoice (£118.50), and 25% of the undisputed items on Invoice 1004 (£568.75), and declined the additional 5% on Invoice 1004. It did not deduct the £500 paid on 2 June 2021 because the respondent gave no basis for doing so. | Upheld | — | £1,215 |
| Other | The claim for travel expenses was dismissed. The tribunal held that it was precluded by section 27(2)(b) ERA 1996 because expenses are excluded from 'wages'. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,215
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.230 ERA 1996 worker definition
- s.27 ERA 1996 wages definition
- New Century Cleaning Co Ltd v Church [2000] IRLR 27
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction Order 1994 art 4
- s.3(2) Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.