Case 2304965/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. E Stringer v Birchington Village Bakery Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2304965/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. E Stringer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Sage determined the case on the papers. The tribunal found that Mrs. E Stringer had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered Birchington Village Bakery Limited to pay damages of £862.05.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,293.08. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 5 May 2020 was cancelled. No discrimination or other statutory claims are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £862.05. | Upheld | — | £862 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,293.08. | Upheld | — | £1,293 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,155
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.