Case 2304983/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Webb v Baltic Star Design & Build Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304983/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Webb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment determined on the papers after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages for July 2023 and ordered payment of £331.05 gross, subject to tax and National Insurance deductions. The claimant's request had been framed in net terms based on her payslip, but the judge awarded the gross figure because the payslip deductions section and P45 had not come through legibly and the year-to-date figures did not reconcile.
The judge also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded 2 days' holiday pay of £224.62 gross. The claimant made no claim for notice pay.
The respondent was further found to be in breach of the duty under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to give a written statement of initial employment particulars, in particular omitting the required notice details, which the judge observed appeared to have been the source of the problems that ensued. The judge stated she was obliged to uplift by two weeks' pay unless exceptional circumstances made that unjust or inequitable, and awarded £1,123.10 on that basis. The judgment records a total payable of £1,678.77 in respect of the sums in paragraphs 2 and 4 of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award made gross (£331.05) for July 2023 salary, subject to tax and NI deductions. Judge noted payslip and P45 not legible in the electronic version, so the judgment is framed to ensure appropriate deductions are made if not already. | Upheld | — | £331 |
| Holiday pay | 2 days' holiday pay awarded gross, subject to tax and NI through payroll. | Upheld | — | £225 |
| Other | Breach of duty to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars compliant with s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996. Two weeks' pay uplift awarded (£1,123.10). No specific claim_type enum value for s.1 ERA particulars failure, so classified as 'other'. | Upheld | — | £1,123 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award made gross (£331.05) for July 2023 salary, subject to tax and NI deductions. Judge noted payslip and P45 not legible in the electronic version, so the judgment is framed to ensure appropriate deductions are made if not already. | Upheld | — | £331 |
| Holiday pay | 2 days' holiday pay awarded gross, subject to tax and NI through payroll. | Upheld | — | £225 |
| Other | Breach of duty to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars compliant with s.1 Employment Rights Act 1996. Two weeks' pay uplift awarded (£1,123.10). No specific claim_type enum value for s.1 ERA particulars failure, so classified as 'other'. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,679
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.