Case 2304984/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M McDonald v NP3 Construction Limited HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 2304984/2021
- Decision date
- 15 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Truscott QC
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M McDonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for a full merits hearing by CVP before Employment Judge Truscott QC on 15 November 2021. After an adjournment, the parties informed the tribunal that the dispute had been settled. The claimant confirmed that he had agreed the settlement with ACAS.
The tribunal amended the respondent's name to NP3 Construction Limited, dismissed the employer's counterclaim, and dismissed the claimant's claim on withdrawal. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims, and it does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the employer's counterclaim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claimant's claim was dismissed on withdrawal after the parties said the dispute had been settled, and the claimant confirmed he had agreed the settlement with ACAS. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.