Case 2304985/2020 · Employment Tribunal
O Senior v Craft Connoisseur Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2304985/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Burge Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
O Senior
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that O Senior was not a worker or an employee of Craft Connoisseur Group Limited. On that basis, it held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the complaints of breach of contract, unauthorised deductions from wages, or race discrimination.
Accordingly, all of the claimant’s claims were dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was not a worker or employee, so it had no jurisdiction to consider the breach of contract complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claimant was not a worker or employee, so it had no jurisdiction to consider the unauthorised deductions from wages complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held the claimant was not a worker or employee, so it had no jurisdiction to consider the race discrimination complaint. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.