Case 2304985/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B W Okma v DL Insurance Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2304985/2023
- Decision date
- 10 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicklin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B W Okma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought an unfair dismissal complaint and a complaint of less favourable treatment under regulation 3(1) of the Fixed-Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002. The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal complaint should have been presented by 29 June 2023 and the FTER complaint by 30 August 2022, but the claimant began ACAS Early Conciliation on 6 July 2023 and presented the claim on 15 September 2023.
For the unfair dismissal complaint, the tribunal found that the claimant knew the facts giving rise to his claim within the primary time limit and was able to find out what was required to bring a tribunal claim. It found there was no good reason to delay because of the internal appeal, and that it was reasonably practicable to present the complaint in time.
For the FTER complaint, the tribunal found that the complained-of event occurred in May 2022, had ended by July 2022, and the claim was presented more than a year out of time. It found no good reason for the delay and concluded that extending time would place the respondent at an unacceptable disadvantage, including because a relevant line manager was no longer employed by the respondent and the cogency of evidence was likely to be affected.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction: the unfair dismissal complaint was presented out of time and it had been reasonably practicable to present it within the primary time limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Fixed-term employee regulations | Dismissed because the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction: the Fixed-Term Employees Regulations complaint was presented out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- reasonably practicable
- just and equitable
- section 207B ERA
- regulation 3(1) FTER
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.