Case 2304994/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M C Mahu v Nellsar Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2304994/2022
- Decision date
- 25 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- Croydon via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M C Mahu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms M C Mahu, did not attend the hearing at Croydon via CVP on 25 March 2025 and did not provide written representations. The respondent, Nellsar Ltd, was represented by counsel, Ms G Nicholls. The tribunal noted that the claimant had sent an email on 24 March 2025 at 8.35pm, but she requested that it be kept confidential.
The tribunal granted the respondent's application under Rule 47 to dismiss the claim because of the claimant's non-attendance. The judgment does not record any determination on the substantive merits of the underlying unfair dismissal complaint, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The respondent's Rule 47 application to dismiss the claim because the claimant did not attend the hearing was successful. The claimant did not provide written representations. She sent an email to the tribunal on 24 March 2025 at 8.35pm, but asked that email be kept confidential. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.