Mr Richard Mills v Omurca Limited — 2023

Case reference: 2304997/2023
Decision date: 23 November 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Fowell JUDGMENT

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Richard Mills

Respondent

Omurca Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal noted that the respondent had indicated it did not intend to defend the claim. On that basis, Employment Judge Fowell entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.

The judgment did not determine compensation. It records that compensation would be dealt with at a separate hearing, the date of which would be notified shortly.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment records that the respondent did not intend to defend the claim and judgment was entered for the claimant under Rule 21. The judgment does not specify the pleaded head(s) of claim, but the case listing categories identify breach of contract.	Upheld	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment records that the respondent did not intend to defend the claim and judgment was entered for the claimant under Rule 21. The judgment does not specify the pleaded head(s) of claim, but the case listing categories identify unlawful deduction from wages.	Upheld	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.