Case 2305008/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Cid Barato v Wentworth International College Limited Heard — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305008/2020
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Cid Barato
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard on 9 July 2021 by CVP before Employment Judge Pritchard, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not appearing. The tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment. It found that Wentworth International College Limited had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay £14,068.96, subject to statutory deductions for income tax and National Insurance.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant’s holiday pay and notice pay claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. It further noted that Mr Simon Mycock, who had been named by the claimant as a second respondent, was not a party to the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £14,068.96, subject to statutory deductions for income tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £14,069 |
| Holiday pay | The claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,069
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.