Case 2305011/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Sahagun v Feyaia Delicatensses Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305011/2023
- Decision date
- 14 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cawthray
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Sahagun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment in Mr I Sahagun's claim against Feyaia Delicatensses Ltd. The tribunal recorded that, by a letter dated 1 March 2024, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Cawthray struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment does not restate the underlying substantive claim category; this classification follows the tribunal listing context provided. The claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant failed to make written representations or request a hearing in response to the 1 March 2024 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.