Case 2305012/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Peile v Anthems Schools Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305012/2024
- Decision date
- 26 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Peile
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 26 November 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim. The warning was given because it appeared that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 07 July 2025 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's letter or request a hearing. Employment Judge Taylor was satisfied that the grounds for striking out under Rule 38 applied and that striking out the claim was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The hearing listed for 01-02 April 2026 will not take place.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim is struck out; the PDF text does not separately address this claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim is struck out; the PDF text does not separately address this claim type. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim is struck out; the PDF text does not separately address this claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.