Case 2305018/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Shashil Perkash v Liberty Gas Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305018/2022
- Decision date
- 3 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Krepski Representation
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Shashil Perkash
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claimant's complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against Liberty Gas Group Ltd on 3 October 2023 at London South via CVP. Employment Judge Krepski sat alone. The only recorded disposal in the written judgment is that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded and was dismissed.
The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days. No further factual findings or remedy figures are set out in the published record, so the decision can only be summarised as a dismissal of the wages deduction complaint on the basis recorded in the oral reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded. Oral reasons were given at the hearing; no written reasons were provided in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.