Case 2305044/2020 · Employment Tribunal
M Peck-Walker v P Shovlar — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305044/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Burge Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Peck-Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 24 June 2021 at London South Employment Tribunals before Employment Judge L Burge, the Tribunal upheld the Claimant M Peck-Walker's complaint that the Respondent P Shovlar had made an unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment records that the Respondent was ordered to pay £513.50, being the amount unlawfully deducted.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. No separate findings are set out in the extracted text beyond the conclusion that the wage deduction claim succeeded and the amount awarded was £513.50.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £513.50. | Upheld | — | £514 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £514
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.