Case 2305048/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms MC Burga Males v Greek2Go Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305048/2021
- Decision date
- 9 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms MC Burga Males
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 5 October 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing for 16 March 2022 was cancelled.
On the merits, the tribunal found that Greek2Go Limited had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £94.78 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of particulars. It ordered payment of 4 weeks’ pay, assessed at £624.72. The total sum awarded by the judgment was £719.50.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from wages and was ordered to pay £94.78 gross. | Upheld | — | £95 |
| Other | The respondent failed to provide a written statement of particulars and was ordered to pay 4 weeks' pay, assessed at £624.72. | Upheld | — | £625 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £720
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.