Case 2305063/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Faulkner v Frys BBQ Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305063/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Faulkner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A Faulkner brought claims against Frys BBQ Ltd for unpaid wages, unpaid holiday pay, and breach of contract. The respondent did not attend the video hearing on 18 May 2022, and the case was heard by Employment Judge Robinson at London South Employment Tribunal.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the claimant’s wages. It ordered payment of £659.34 net of tax and national insurance for that claim.
The tribunal also held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday. It ordered payment of £71.59 net of tax and national insurance for that claim.
The claimant’s breach of contract claim, based on the respondent’s failure to give notice, was found not well-founded and was dismissed. The judgment does not refer to any separate interest award or other remedy beyond the two net sums ordered for the successful wage and holiday claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages for failure to pay wages; ordered net of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £659 |
| Holiday pay | Unauthorised deductions from wages for failure to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday; ordered net of tax and national insurance. | Upheld | — | £72 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for breach of contract based on failure to give notice was held not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £731
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.