Case 2305078/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Unite The Union & Others (see schedule) v Spicers Limited (in administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305078/2020
- Decision date
- 2 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burge Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Unite The Union & Others (see schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in a multiple case brought by Unite The Union and others against Spicers Limited (in administration). The tribunal recorded that a protective award should be paid to the claimants listed in the schedule, but only to those who were members of the claimant trade union and who had been employed as Warehouse Operatives or Warehouse Supervisors at the Greenwich branch.
The award was limited to a protected period of 59 days. The tribunal further stated that remuneration was to be paid for that 59-day period pursuant to section 190 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. No separate monetary total was set out in the judgment text provided.
The tribunal made no order as to costs. The decision was signed by Employment Judge Burge on 2 July 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment by consent recorded a protective award for the claimants listed in the attached schedule, limited to those who were members of the claimant trade union and employed by the respondent as Warehouse Operatives or Warehouse Supervisors at the Greenwich branch. The award was for a protected period of 59 days and remuneration was to be paid under section 190 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.190 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.