Case 2305089/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gregory v Screaming Colour Limited (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305089/2021
- Decision date
- 15 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Bryant QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Gregory
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a valid response in time. On that basis, the tribunal made a determination without a hearing on liability.
The tribunal found that Screaming Colour Limited had breached Mr A Gregory’s contract of employment and ordered it to pay damages of £4,339.04. The judgment records no separate split of the award into distinct heads of loss and no additional remedy components.
The listed hearing on 9 March 2022 was vacated. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge K Bryant QC on 15 February 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response in time. | Upheld | — | £4,339 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,339
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,339
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.