Case 2305089/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Yousef Shaheen v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305089/2023
- Decision date
- 12 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Yousef Shaheen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn Mr Yousef Shaheen v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, Employment Judge Fowell heard a preliminary issue by video at Croydon on 10 September 2024 and struck out the claim in its entirety on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The written record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No remedy was awarded because the case did not proceed beyond the strike-out stage.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out in its entirety because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The extracted text does not set out separate reasons for this head of claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out in its entirety because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The extracted text does not set out separate reasons for this head of claim. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.