Case 2305089/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claire Groeneveld v Clean Cold Power UK Limited (in administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305089/2024
- Decision date
- 10 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lumby REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claire Groeneveld
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard by Employment Judge Lumby at Croydon (by CVP) on 10 December 2025. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent, Clean Cold Power UK Limited (in administration), did not attend.
The Tribunal made a protective award in favour of the claimant in the sum of £12,698.16. The award was made on the basis that the respondent had failed to collectively consult and to elect employee representatives, in breach of section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing; written reasons will only be provided on request within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award under s.188 TULR(C)A 1992 for failure to collectively consult and to elect employee representatives. | Upheld | — | £12,698 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,698
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.