Case 2305103/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs O Lawrence v Kreative Learning Childcare Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305103/2023
- Decision date
- 31 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks-Bowyer Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs O Lawrence
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to file an ET3 Response within the time allowed. The Employment Judge entered judgment under Rule 21 after the claimant confirmed the claims brought and the identity of her employer.
The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Kreative Learning Childcare Limited and found that the claim had been validly served at the respondent's registered address. It found that the respondent unlawfully deducted wages from April 2023 to July 2023 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,652.00, with the claimant to account to HMRC for any tax due.
All other claims indicated by the claimant in her claim form were dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not identify those other claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment states the respondent unlawfully deducted wages from April 2023 to July 2023. All other claims indicated in the claim form were dismissed upon withdrawal, but the judgment does not identify those claims. | Upheld | — | £2,652 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,652
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.