Case 2305110/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Liam Vecsi & ors v Caskaway Taverns Ltd t/a Thomas Becket Pub — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305110/2025
- Decision date
- 27 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Liam Vecsi & ors
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Corrigan determined this Rule 22 default judgment after the respondent (Caskaway Taverns Ltd t/a Thomas Becket Pub) failed to present a valid response on time. The claim was presented on 27 May 2025, and the respondent's name was confirmed as correctly named.
The Judge found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages (gross equivalent of £459.88 net per pay-slip 46), failed to pay holiday entitlement of 130 accrued hours at £13/hour (£1,690 gross), and failed to pay the employer's 3% pension contribution on £49,448.50, awarding damages for breach of contract of £1,483.45. The total award was £3,633.33. The judgment noted the gross figure for week 46 had not been supplied and could be amended on production of the relevant pay-slip within 7 days. The companion case 2305111/2025 (Ms Haines) was dismissed as appearing to have been issued in error.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Net figure of £459.88 awarded subject to tax/NI adjustments (gross figure not supplied for week 46). | Upheld | — | £460 |
| Holiday pay | 130 hours accrued at £13/hour. | Upheld | — | £1,690 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for failure to pay 3% employer pension contribution on £49,448.50. | Upheld | — | £1,483 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,633
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.