Case 2305135/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Quye v Ms N Campbell-Crabb and Mr P Graham T/a Red Lion, Brede — 2020
- Case reference
- 2305135/2019
- Decision date
- 11 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Quye
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been entered by the Respondent, and the tribunal recorded that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment does not set out liability reasoning beyond the Rule 21 default position.
The matter was listed for a further in-person remedy hearing on 4 May 2020, to last three hours at London South Employment Tribunal, Montague Court, 101 London Rd, West Croydon, CR0 2RF, starting at 10am. The judgment states that the Respondent would only be permitted to participate to the extent allowed by the judge dealing with that hearing.
The claimant was directed to bring three copies of the evidence relied upon in support of the compensation claims. No monetary award was determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | No response having been entered by the Respondent; the judgment records that the claim of unfair dismissal succeeds under Rule 21. No compensation amount is decided in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.