Case 2305143/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Talabi-Aderoju v Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305143/2019
- Decision date
- 30 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O Talabi-Aderoju
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in which the claimant’s proceedings against the respondents were withdrawn. The order records that no dismissal under Employment Tribunal Rule 52, or otherwise, was made because the claimant reserved her right to bring a claim against the first respondent in the County Court arising out of the same facts.
The order also makes clear that the claimant did not reserve any right to resurrect the Employment Tribunal proceedings or to bring a new tribunal claim against the respondents arising out of the same facts. The respondents’ rights to take any lawful points in defence of any County Court claim were expressly reserved.
The only monetary figure recorded in the order is that the claimant will pay a proportion of the respondents’ costs in the sum of £4,200 within 30 days of approval of the consent order. No tribunal award is set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Judgment by consent. The order withdraws the proceedings against the respondents and does not identify the substantive claims in the order itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.