Case 2305156/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Jazukevicius v Central Market Holdings UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305156/2020
- Decision date
- 5 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- by CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Jazukevicius
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Jazukevicius, succeeded on two monetary claims and failed on the redundancy payment claim. The tribunal found that he had less than one year of continuous service at the effective date of termination, so he was not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also found that he had been employed for more than one month but less than one year, which entitled him to one week’s notice under section 86(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent had not paid that notice pay, so the claim for unlawful deduction from wages was well founded and the tribunal ordered payment of £500 net.
The claim for ten days of unpaid accrued holiday was also well founded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,000 net in respect of that holiday pay. The combined award recorded in the judgment was therefore £1,500 net.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant had less than one year of continuous service at the effective date of termination and was therefore not entitled to a statutory redundancy payment under section 155 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to one week’s notice under section 86(1) ERA 1996 and that the failure to pay notice pay was a well-founded unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claim for ten days of unpaid accrued holiday was well founded and awarded compensation in the net sum of £1,000. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,500
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 155 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 86(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.