Case 2305175/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Boereboom v Holroyd Howe Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305175/2023
- Decision date
- 9 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Wright Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Boereboom
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent, the respondent’s name was amended to Holroyd Howe Limited. The tribunal found that Mr M Boereboom had been wrongfully dismissed.
The only monetary order recorded was that the respondent must pay the claimant £5,111.47 gross of tax in respect of his notice pay. No other heads of claim, findings, or remedy elements were set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal held the claimant was wrongfully dismissed and ordered payment of £5,111.47 gross of tax in respect of notice pay. | Upheld | — | £5,111 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,111
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.