Case 2305196/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C J Payne v Boxed Freeze Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305196/2020
- Decision date
- 15 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C J Payne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 18 September 2020. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No hearing dates are recorded in the extracted judgment.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £2,640 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,517.90 net for that claim.
The judgment further recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,697.75 net. In addition, the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and the tribunal ordered payment of £473 gross.
The total payable was stated to be £8,328.65. The judgment also noted that the claimant is responsible for any payments owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages; award stated as £2,640 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,640 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract as to notice; award stated as £2,517.90 net. | Upheld | — | £2,518 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,697.75 net. | Upheld | — | £2,698 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement; award stated as £473 gross. | Upheld | — | £473 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,329
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.