Case 2305196/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr.M.S. Ibrahim v Penai Constructions Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305196/2023
- Decision date
- 18 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Representation
- Venue
- London South Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr.M.S. Ibrahim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found Mr M.S. Ibrahim's complaints of unfair dismissal, refusal to permit the exercise of rights under regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998, breach of contract for failure to make any payment in lieu of notice, and failure to provide a statement of initial employment particulars well-founded. The separate breach of contract complaint about pension contributions was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed on that basis.
The tribunal awarded a total of £30,987.12. The judgment records a basic award of £4,666.44, calculated as 12 weeks at a gross weekly pay of £388.87; a compensatory award of £997.20, described as 18 days' pay at £55.40 per day; £500 for loss of statutory rights; holiday pay of £23,268, calculated as 420 days of outstanding holiday at £55.40 per day; and £1,555.48, described as four weeks' pay, for failure to provide a statement of initial employment particulars.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded. The award section records a basic award of £4,666.44, a compensatory award of £997.20, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £6,164 |
| Working time regulations | The complaint under regulations 13 and 13A of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well-founded. The judgment awards £23,268 for 420 days of outstanding holiday at £55.40 per day. | Upheld | — | £23,268 |
| Breach of contract | The complaint for failure to make any payment in lieu of notice was well-founded. The dispositive section does not identify a separate monetary figure for this head. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant withdrew the complaint about failure to make pension contributions and it was dismissed on that basis. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found the complaint about failure to provide a statement of initial employment particulars well-founded. The judgment awards £1,555.48, described as four weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,555 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £30,987
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,666
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £997
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.