Case 2305204/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Dr T William v Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305204/2020
- Decision date
- 17 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash
- Venue
- Croydon - in person
- Panel members
- Ms C Edwards, Mr S Corkerton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr T William
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Dr T William, brought a claim against Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust arising from alleged detriment on the grounds that she made a protected disclosure.
The tribunal decided that the respondent did not subject the claimant to a detriment on the grounds that she made a protected disclosure. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment records only that the respondent did not subject the claimant to a detriment on the grounds that she made a protected disclosure; oral reasons were given and no written reasons are included in the supplied text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.