Case 2305217/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Lloyd v Elmhurst School Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2305217/2019
- Decision date
- 22 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs L Lloyd
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing by telephone on 22 May 2020 before Employment Judge Pritchard. The judgment records that the claimant, Mrs L Lloyd, appeared in person and was assisted by her husband, Mr S Lloyd, and that the respondents were represented by counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the second respondent, Bellevue Education International Limited, from the proceedings. The reasons state that both parties agreed the claimant was employed by the first respondent, Elmhurst School Limited, and that the first respondent was the correct respondent in the case.
No substantive liability findings were made on the underlying employment claim, and no monetary remedy was determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | At the preliminary hearing on 22 May 2020, the tribunal dismissed the second respondent from the proceedings. The reasons state that both parties agreed the claimant was employed by the first respondent, which was the correct respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.