Case 2305222/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. K Xtian v Ocs Uk&i Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2305222/2023
- Decision date
- 13 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mclaren Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. K Xtian
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint, stating that the dismissal was fair and that the complaint was not well-founded. No remedy was awarded on that claim.
The direct race discrimination claim was also dismissed as not well-founded. The written judgment does not set out further reasons, as the tribunal recorded that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The unlawful deduction from wages claim was dismissed on limitation grounds. The tribunal found that the claim had not been presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so within time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was fairly dismissed and held the complaint was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The complaint of direct race discrimination was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the claim was presented outside the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to present it in time, so it was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.