Case 2305225/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Young v Mitchells & Butlers Retail Ltd. CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305225/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harley
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at an Open Preliminary Hearing on 9 May 2023 before Employment Judge Harley sitting alone. The tribunal cancelled the listed full hearing and determined the respondent's strike-out application. It held that the claimant's claims were struck out under rule 37 because she had behaved unreasonably in the conduct of the claim and had failed to comply with the Tribunal's Case Management Order dated 8 November 2022.
The tribunal found that the claimant had not supplied a statement of loss, any evidence on which she intended to rely, or a witness statement, had not engaged in preparation of a trial bundle, and had not responded to the respondent's correspondence or to the Tribunal's warning letter of 3 April 2023. At the hearing, the claimant accepted the non-compliance, said she had returned to work in November 2022 and that caring responsibilities had taken priority, and referred to medical issues in autumn 2022. The tribunal held that those matters did not excuse the non-engagement, concluded that a fair hearing was not possible because only one side was participating, and said there was no lesser sanction than strike out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment disposes of the claims collectively and does not list each cause of action; this claim type is taken from the published case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment disposes of the claims collectively and does not list each cause of action; this claim type is taken from the published case listing. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment disposes of the claims collectively and does not list each cause of action; this claim type is taken from the published case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37(1)(b)
- rule 37(1)(c)
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.