Case 2305233/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Olsen v Prince’s Leisure Group Limited trading as Prince’s Golf Club — 2021
- Case reference
- 2305233/2020
- Decision date
- 22 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beckett London
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Olsen
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr W Olsen brought claims against Prince’s Leisure Group Limited trading as Prince’s Golf Club in relation to notice pay and unlawful deductions from wages. Employment Judge Beckett, sitting alone at London South via CVP on 22 June 2021, dismissed the notice pay claim because the claimant had been paid in lieu of notice.
The unlawful deductions claim was also dismissed. The tribunal found that the respondent had made lawful deductions from the claimant’s wages to repay a loan, and that the loan repayment arrangement had been agreed in writing before the deductions were made.
No costs were awarded to the respondent. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim concerned notice pay. The tribunal found it was not well founded because the claimant had been paid in lieu of notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the deductions from wages were lawful because they were made to repay a loan agreed in writing before the deductions were taken. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.