Case 2305269/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305269/2020
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morton Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment is a short disposal order from the Employment Tribunal at London South before Employment Judge Morton Date on 12 December 2022. The Claimant, Mr M Zaib, appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by Ms S Harty, Counsel.
The only substantive order recorded in the text is that all of the Claimant's claims against Mark Richards, Sixth Respondent, and Gregory Ashton, Eighth Respondent, are dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The extract does not set out any findings on the merits of the underlying allegations.
No remedy, liability finding, or legal test is recorded in the supplied text beyond the withdrawal-based dismissal. The extract also does not identify any lay members or provide a split between individual heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment states that all of the Claimant's claims against Mark Richards, Sixth Respondent, and Gregory Ashton, Eighth Respondent, were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.