Case 2305271/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Westwell v Kent Coach Travel Limited AT: LONDON SOUTH (By telephone) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2305271/2019
- Decision date
- 2 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Westwell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat under Rule 21 after no response was received from the respondent and no one appeared for the respondent at the telephone hearing. Employment Judge Siddall heard evidence from Mr G Westwell, who worked as a driver from July 2019 until 28 October 2019. The tribunal amended the respondent's name to Kent Coach Travel Limited, reflecting the employer name on the claimant's payslips and the claimant's evidence that Travelmasters was likely a trading name.
The claim was for unpaid wages for the week 21 to 27 October 2019. The tribunal accepted the claimant's calculation that he had worked 25 hours on school journeys at £10 per hour, 24 hours of railway work at £10 per hour, and 15 hours on Sunday 27 October at the weekend rate of £10.50 per hour. It accepted the total lost wages figure of £647.50 gross and found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £648 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £648
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.