Case 2305274/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Ajibola v NL Consulting London Limited (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305274/2023
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Ajibola
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 02 October 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, without a hearing on the merits.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages for the period 18 June 2023 to 15 July 2023, and ordered payment of £1,419.52 gross. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement of 4 days, and ordered payment of £292.60 gross.
The total sum ordered to be paid was £1,712.12. The judgment records that the claimant must account to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of any payment received pursuant to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 18 June 2023 to 15 July 2023; awarded gross. Rule 21/22 default judgment as the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £1,420 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement of 4 days; awarded gross. Listed under Working Time Regulations on gov.uk; the judgment frames it as holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £293 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages for the period 18 June 2023 to 15 July 2023; awarded gross. Rule 21/22 default judgment as the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £1,420 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement of 4 days; awarded gross. Listed under Working Time Regulations on gov.uk; the judgment frames it as holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £293 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,712
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.