Case 2305289/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M French v Swalecliffe Pharmacy Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2305289/2021
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Representation
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M French
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a brief judgment issued on 26 September 2022 at London South via CVP before Employment Judge Wright sitting alone. The tribunal recorded that Mrs M French's constructive unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed.
The judgment also records that the claimant withdrew her claims for notice pay, holiday pay, arrears of pay, failure to provide a written statement of employment terms, and failure to provide itemised pay statements. No monetary award or remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim described as arrears of pay was withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment terms was withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for failure to provide itemised pay statements was withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.