Mr P Z Bagayogo v Cedar Recruitment — 2022

Case reference: 2305313/2021
Decision date: 21 September 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge A.M.S. Green

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Z Bagayogo

Respondent

Cedar Recruitment

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a hearing in London South by CVP on 21 September 2022 before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green, Mr P Z Bagayogo appeared in person and Cedar Recruitment was represented by counsel. The record does not identify any lay members.

The tribunal held that the claims had been presented out of time and therefore that it did not have jurisdiction to hear them. The judgment records no substantive findings on the underlying claims and no remedy.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	The judgment records only that the claims were presented out of time and that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear them; it does not separately analyse this claim.	Dismissed	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment records only that the claims were presented out of time and that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear them; it does not separately analyse this claim.	Dismissed	—	—
Other	Used for the remaining non-enum employment claim(s) reflected in the listing; the judgment records only that the claims were out of time and does not separately analyse this claim.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.