Case 2305322/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Jackson v Drew Neat Gardening Services — 2020
- Case reference
- 2305322/2019
- Decision date
- 16 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 31 December 2019, the tribunal gave Mr C Jackson an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the unfair dismissal claim should not be struck out on the basis that he had been employed for less than two years and the tribunal could not consider the complaint. Mr Jackson did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal claim. The judgment records that the remaining claims would proceed, but it does not determine them in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out after the claimant was given an opportunity by letter dated 31 December 2019 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out because he had been employed for less than two years and the tribunal could not consider the complaint of unfair dismissal. The claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.