Case 2305322/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Angus Aldridge v Warwick Square Developments Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2305322/2024
- Decision date
- 9 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Angus Aldridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the London South Employment Tribunal on 1 July 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that a determination of the claim could properly be made.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £6,596.88 gross. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay expenses incurred by the claimant during the course of his employment, amounting to £279.69, and that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, with damages of £641.87.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £7,518.44 in total. The judgment notes it is for the claimant to account to HMRC for any sums owed in respect of amounts received pursuant to the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages; award stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £6,597 |
| Breach of contract | Claimant dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded. | Upheld | — | £642 |
| Other | Unpaid expenses incurred during the course of employment. Not clearly mapped to a single §4.4 enum; closest gov.uk hint was working time/written pay statement but the judgment frames this as unpaid expenses. | Upheld | — | £280 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages; award stated as gross. | Upheld | — | £6,597 |
| Breach of contract | Claimant dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded. | Upheld | — | £642 |
| Other | Unpaid expenses incurred during the course of employment. Not clearly mapped to a single §4.4 enum; closest gov.uk hint was working time/written pay statement but the judgment frames this as unpaid expenses. | Upheld | — | £280 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,518
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.